In the complex and intricate domain of quality control, one name stands tall and commands respect like no other: Daryl Guberman. With a legacy that stretches over four remarkable decades, Guberman’s extensive expertise transcends the boundaries of a single industry. He stands as a beacon of guidance and knowledge across a broad spectrum of sectors, each marked by its unique challenges and intricacies. In a world where the pursuit of quality is paramount, Daryl Guberman has emerged as a trusted advisor, helping companies navigate the treacherous waters of quality control while achieving substantial cost savings. What sets him apart, however, is not just his wealth of experience but his unwavering commitment to instilling confidence in the quality of products and services that businesses offer, transforming them into beacons of reliability in the eyes of consumers.
What sets Guberman apart from the rest is not only his profound knowledge but also his unyielding commitment to ensuring that quality standards are not just met but exceeded. This dedication has solidified his standing as a leading figure in these industries, an authority whose word carries weight and whose recommendations are highly sought after.
In the context of this article, it is of paramount importance to recognize that the insights and revelations presented herein draw from the extensive research and findings of Daryl Guberman. His tireless pursuit of truth and commitment to transparency form the bedrock upon which this narrative is built. This article isn’t just a glimpse into the world of quality; it is an expedition that delves deep into the complex interplay of quality control, allegations of criminal activity, and the omnipresent influence of corporate entities. As we embark on this journey, guided by the wisdom and experience of Daryl Guberman, we uncover a narrative that is as dramatic as it is enlightening, revealing the hidden forces at play in the world of standards and quality.
The Hidden Criminality of ANSI https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ansi-acquires-full-ownership-of-anab-enhancing-accreditation-services-portfolio-across-global-market-300760006.html
In the intricate world of quality control, the American National Standards Institute (ANSI)- and the American National Accreditation Board -ANAB plays a significant role. This organization is responsible for setting and maintaining quality standards across various industries. However, what we uncover is not a straightforward story of standards and regulations. Instead, a shocking revelation emerges – ANSI-ANAB, which is supposed to ensure quality, is alleged to be involved in criminal activities. They are also underwriters for the IAF (International Accreditation Forum incorporated in Delaware- They’re an association of accreditation bodies national and international) And ILAC (International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (In Australia).
What this means is that ANSI-ANAB is liable for product failure within the system of manufacturing. It is responsible for accreditation bodies that are members of the IAF who are all IAF-MRA (Multi-regional agreement, & IAF-MLA (Multi-lateral agreement). They are equivalent to ANSI-ANAB accreditation.
This revelation is more than just surprising; it’s deeply disconcerting. It calls into question the very foundation of quality control and standards. The implications are profound and far-reaching, affecting not just the industries it oversees but also the trust that consumers and businesses place in these standards. This controversy demands a closer look, as it goes beyond mere allegations and dives into the heart of a complex issue that needs to be understood and addressed.
The revelations surrounding AOG Technics AOG Technics Appears To Have Falsified (Fudged) 50 Critical Aerospace Engine Parts.
It has come to light that this company, operating in the aerospace industry, appears to have engaged in the highly concerning practice of falsifying or tampering with a staggering 50 critical aerospace engine parts. Such actions not only compromise the safety and integrity of aerospace equipment but also raise significant questions about the ethical standards and regulatory oversight within this industry. The implications of this revelation are far-reaching, affecting not only the trust that consumers and businesses place in aerospace technology but also potentially endangering lives. It serves as a stark reminder of the critical importance of rigorous quality control and the need for heightened vigilance against deceptive practices within the aerospace sector. QA Expert Daryl Guberman States, “Congress Investigate Underwriters ANSI-ANAB Over AOG Technics” https://youtu.be/YDKH5HWyqB8?si=WfciiIZmQHJvcD_Y
The OEM’s Disturbing Role
Going deeper into this complicated situation, we discover a troubling connection between big companies known as Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and organizations that give out special certificates, which we’ll call accreditation bodies. These OEMs have a lot of power, and they don’t just ask but sometimes force the companies that supply them to follow the rules set by these accreditation bodies. What makes this even more concerning is that these big companies also sit on the boards of these accreditation bodies. This means they have a say in how things are done, and it makes it seem like they have too much control over something that should be fair and unbiased.
Now, let’s talk about what happened in 2022. Daryl Guberman decided to take a bold step by applying to become a Director at large on ANSI’s -ANAB board. ANSI -ANAB is the American National Standards Institute, National accreditation, which is supposed to make sure things are done the right way. What he found out during this process was quite surprising. There’s a saying or a way of doing things that ANSI follows, and it seems that this saying is closely connected to the quality of products made by these big OEMs.
For example, even companies like Boeing, who are known for not always keeping accurate records (Falsified papers, sloppy work led FAA to fine Boeing https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-boeing-fine-disclosure-20170213-story.html ), are involved with ANSI. Big pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer (Pfizer Skipped Critical Testing and Cut Corners on Quality Standards, Documents Reveal
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-skipped-critical-testing-quality-standards-covid-vaccine/) and Johnson & Johnson also seem to be part of this, and they’re being accused of not following the right quality rules (Quality control issues force Johnson & Johnson to scrap doses of COVID-19 vaccine https://www.cbsnews.com/news/quality-control-issues-force-johnson-johnson-to-scrap-doses-of-covid-19-vaccine/#tbl-em-lntojiq8f70hcbn5ds7). This is a big deal because it shows that these giant corporations have a lot of control over an organization that affects a lot of things. It’s a reminder that these companies have a lot of influence, and it’s a situation that we need to pay attention to.
A Letter that Clarifies A Lot (Link Was Used For Article https://youtu.be/fLDDjvu0aSY?si=pPlBx2S96wrNeq2G)
Amid these surprising revelations, an alarming letter has come to light. This letter hints that the certificates issued by the ANSI Accreditation Board (ANAB) might not be as reliable as we would hope. What’s even more astonishing is a statement from Randy Doughtery, who served as the Chairman and Vice President of ANAB back in 2009-2015 &IAF Chairman and Principal on its 990-tax form. His words raise significant concerns: “We are not operating under any governmental regulatory authority, with the exception of being a legal entity.”
Randy’s statement prompts us to question whether ANSI-ANAB is adhering to the right standards. Essentially, it’s as if they’re saying they don’t have many rules to follow, except for the basic legal ones. This raises important doubts about the legitimacy and trustworthiness of the certificates they issue. It’s a critical matter that requires deeper scrutiny and understanding.
The Intricate Web of Government Influence
As we dig deeper into this complex situation, we uncover a tangled web of government involvement that is deeply concerning. Let’s break it down step by step. There’s an organization called NIST, which stands for the National Institute of Standards and Technology. It’s part of the Department of Commerce and plays a significant role on ANSI’s board the American National Standards Institute. This is where things get even more complicated. There’s another organization called NIST MEP, which stands for the National Institute of Standards and Technology Manufacturing Extension Partnership. This big organization is spread across all fifty states in the United States. It receives money from both the federal government and state governments.
But here’s the shocking part: a whopping 65% of the money they get is spent on management and paying their staff, leaving very little for what they’re actually supposed to do. This raises serious questions about how they’re using the funds they receive.
Now, let’s talk about Mr. Randy Doughtery’s claim that the ANSI-ANAB Accreditation Board is “non-governmental.” This statement becomes doubtful when we consider some compelling evidence. One person, Gordon Gillerman of NIST, received a significant payment of $120,000, which was described as a royalty payment. This payment raises concerns about financial connections between ANSI-ANAB and government individuals.
And the reach of government influence goes even further. The Department of Homeland Security-DHS also has a say in ANSI’s board. Mr. Philip Maston, who serves as the Executive Director of the Office of Standards at the US Department of Homeland Security and the $262,000 ANSI-ANAB royalty payment, adds another layer of complexity to the situation. It’s a tangled web of connections and influence that we need to understand better.
Unmasking the Tyranny of ANSI ANAB
Amidst this complex and tangled web of discoveries, we uncover the shadowy aspects of ANSI ANAB’s operations. It raises some fundamental questions about whether the groups responsible for keeping quality standards in check are as honest and open as they should be. This isn’t just a story about quality but a much larger tale that involves dishonesty, big businesses having too much control, and the influence of the government.
As we journey through the information shared by Daryl Guberman, it’s a strong reminder that the world of quality control isn’t as clean and perfect as it may seem. Instead, it’s more like a play filled with secrets and hidden motives, where the interests of big corporations and the government mix with the important goal of maintaining quality.
In the face of these shocking revelations, there’s a call for more honesty and openness. It’s a battle cry, a demand for accountability and transparency. The fight against corruption and sneaky actions is ongoing, with Daryl Guberman leading the way. He’s like a warrior (David Vs. Goliath) wielding the sword of truth in a world clouded by secrets and lies.
But the story doesn’t end here. We need to delve even deeper into these complex matters to understand the full picture. This is a journey that takes us through twists and turns, revealing more about how the world of quality and standards really operates. It’s a story that we must pay attention to, as it affects us all in one way or another.
Daryl Guberman’s findings within the intricate realm of quality control unveil a multifaceted narrative of paramount importance. These revelations provide a comprehensive look into the complex landscape of quality standards and their implementation, punctuated by key discoveries that warrant our attention.
One of the central findings brought to light by Guberman is the shadowy underbelly of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), an organization entrusted with the responsibility of establishing and maintaining quality standards across diverse industries. These revelations challenge the very foundation of quality control, as they suggest that ANSI-ANAB may not merely serve as a standard-setting body but may be involved in activities of a more sinister nature. These findings prompt us to reevaluate the systems in place, raising profound questions about the legitimacy and transparency of the very entities designed to safeguard and enforce quality standards.
Another critical revelation stemming from Guberman’s work delves into the disturbing nexus between major Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and accreditation bodies. OEMs, often wielding significant influence, exert not only pressure but, in some cases, force their suppliers to adhere to the standards outlined by these accreditation bodies (ANSI-ANAB). The influence of these OEMs goes even further as they actively participate on the boards of these very accreditation bodies. These findings underscore the implications of corporate dominance over what should ideally be a neutral and unbiased entity. This revelation has broader implications for the independence and integrity of quality control mechanisms, casting a long shadow over the sector.
In 2022, Daryl Guberman boldly sought a Director at large position on ANSI’s board, a decision that led to a revelation of significant proportions. It was discovered that ANSI operated by a distinct set of principles intricately connected to the quality standards upheld by major OEMs. These OEMs, some known for discrepancies in documentation like Boeing and others of pharmaceutical repute, such as Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson, appeared to have a considerable influence on ANSI-ANAB. This unsettling finding places these corporations under scrutiny for allegedly sidestepping quality processes and standards. The interconnectedness of these corporations with ANSI-ANAB, alongside their involvement in pivotal government agencies, including the FDA, FBI, FAA, CDC, NIH, and USDA, to name only a few, underscores the multifaceted nature of this issue. These findings serve as a stark reminder of the powerful influence that corporate entities can wield, potentially at the expense of impartial oversight.
In the midst of these startling revelations, a letter emerged that hints at the compromised nature of certificates issued by the ANSI Accreditation Board (ANAB). Randy Doughtery, who held the position of Chairman and Vice President of ANAB (2009-2015) and IAF Chairman and Principal on the 990 tax form), delivered a statement that raised serious concerns. He asserted that ANSI-ANAB was not operating under any governmental regulatory authority except as a legal entity. This revelation challenges the very foundations of the certificates issued by ANSI-ANAB and prompts us to question their legitimacy and trustworthiness.
As we delve deeper into the complex narrative, another layer of government involvement emerges. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a part of the Department of Commerce, occupies a prominent position on ANSI’s board. However, the presence of NIST MEP (National Institute of Standards and Technology Manufacturing Extension Partnership) in all fifty states of the United States, funded by both federal and state resources, raises a series of disconcerting questions. A staggering 65% of the funds allocated to NIST MEP are directed toward management and personnel costs, leaving a meager portion for the organization’s intended mission. These findings underscore concerns about the allocation of public funds and the organization’s efficiency in fulfilling its mandate.
As we untangle the layers of this narrative, it becomes apparent that these revelations aren’t confined to the realm of quality control alone. They transcend this narrow boundary, encompassing questions of corruption, corporate control, interlocking directorates, and the pervasive influence of government bodies. Guberman’s findings underscore the imperative need for accountability and transparency within these sectors, casting a spotlight on issues that impact us all, from the safety of aerospace technology to the quality of our daily lives.
This narrative remains an ongoing journey, an exploration of the intricate mechanisms that underlie the world of standards and quality. With each revelation, we move closer to a comprehensive understanding of this complex realm, driven by the pursuit of transparency, truth, and integrity.
Daryl Guberman
Daryl Guberman boasts a wealth of experience spanning four decades in the realm of quality across diverse sectors, including aerospace, medical implants, medical materials, printing, plastic distribution, consulting, NADCAP implementation, and certification services. His expertise transcends industry boundaries, as he has successfully advised companies from various sectors, enabling them to achieve substantial cost savings while instilling confidence in the quality of their products and services.
Daryl Guberman is widely recognized as an authority in specialized areas such as aerospace, medical implants and materials, and printing. He is renowned for his in-depth knowledge and unwavering commitment to quality standards in these fields.
For those seeking his guidance or wishing to discuss potential projects, Daryl Guberman is readily accessible via phone at 203-556-1493 or email at daryltqrs@yahoo.com. You can get in touch with him directly to tap into his wealth of knowledge and experience.
Contact Information:
Name: Daryl Guberman
Company: Guberman-PMC, LLC
Address: 1345 Barnum Avenue, Suite 306, Stratford, CT 06614
Telephone: 203-556-1493
YouTube
Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@darylguberman4242/videos
Email: daryltqrs@yahoo.com
